For instance, there was reported a case where a young man stabbed his fellow student with a screwdriver in a high school. He did not need a gun to commit the murder, yet there was crime in the school.
People are also denied freedom of some activities such as hunting. For many people, hunting is a hobby, and a gun is used in hunting the wild animals. When there are gun control laws, it is very obvious that they are deprived of their interest in their hobby. For these reasons, there should no be gun control laws, as people should be allowed to use the guns at their discretion Dixon, Most Americans cling to the second amendment that allows citizens to hold firearms wherever they go for their own safety.
Most people also believe that the second amendment was placed so that the citizens would be protected from the tyrannical government that seemed to keep people in fear. People would have the power to rebel in case the government introduced dictatorial policies for their people. However, though this was not the main aim why people were issued with guns, it served as a purpose as the power of the government would be regulated in a way that the people would be given a chance to make their own ideas and also be given a voice in the government.
This is because of the power they were believed to have after they were given the go- ahead to possess the firearms. The second amendment states that the right of people to keep their arms should not be infringed by any means. The amendment mentions a well- regulated militia which is a phrase that means a group of citizens that act in position of an army. It continues to describe that it is necessary to the security of a free state.
In this phrase, it means that the group will be in the frontline in making sure that it meets the goals and the interests of the citizen army.
The main objective of the citizen army is to protect the best interests of the country, as well as, protecting the government also from foreign intervention. This means that when the gun control laws are being introduced, the main intention of introducing the second amendment is being assumed. This means that the country would be left at the stake of only the military and the citizens would not have the power of protecting their government, as well as, the best interests of their nation Lott Another main reason why the second amendment was made was that the South would be able to control the slaves.
Guns would be essential in helping carry out slavery in the South at ease. Therefore, state militias served as slave patrols where they had to be given the mandate and responsibility to hold guns so that they would be able to control the slaves. The second amendment was also made because of the rebellions that used to take place in the country. For example, the whiskey rebellion caused the government to revoke the amendment as a way of controlling the militias in helping stop the rebellion.
The farmers were rebelling against the government for imposing a new tax, yet it had not been there previously. When the amendment was made, room for rebel had not been created against the government. However, such rebellions were experienced when the government was not in a position to meet certain needs of the people or it acted in such a way that people viewed as selfish or had corrupt intentions.
For this reason, the state has been enjoying its democratic right because rebellions and demonstrations are respected because the government realizes the power within the people.
If such power had not been vested in the people, it would be difficult in the United States to stage rebellions and demonstrations in fight for human rights and freedom. With gun control, it should not pose any problem. The next thing you need is a powerful argument. Obviously, for that, you need to adopt either a pro or an anti gun control standpoint.
Notably, this choice will not always be up to you. Your teacher may ask you to write a pro gun control argumentative essay, even if do not share this opinion. In this case, you will still have to gather solid evidence to support your argument. You should think of it as valuable training. Besides, to write an excellent argumentative essay, you need a solid understanding of both "your" argument and the opposing one.
So, on the bright side, you already have that. Once you have that, you move on to research. As you may guess, you should not focus on your side of the argument exclusively.
On the contrary, a strong gun control argumentative essay has to present two conflicting views on the issue. So, you have to conduct some research in both directions. After conducting your research, you should outline your essay and move on to writing. Like any other essay, your argumentative essay on gun control will consist of three parts: The introduction is where you present your topic, some background information, and your opinion which you set out to prove in your essay.
The main body is where you present both sides of the argument and your opinion on the issue along with an explanation of why you stand in favor of this particular opinion. Finally, you conclude your gun control argumentative essay with re-stating your opinion and pointing out why it makes sense.
On a first glance, a persuasive essay may seem not that much different from an argumentative one. However, there is a drastic difference between them. An argumentative essay focuses on proving your point logically, whereas a persuasive essay is aimed at convincing your reader that you are right. This may seem vague, so let us take a closer look.
There are three commonly accepted ways of persuasion: Ethos appeals to the reader's sense of ethics and employs the author's authority on the issue. Pathos appeals to the reader's emotions and employs the irrational. Logos appeals to the reader's common sense and employs logic.
In an argumentative essay, you are essentially limited to logos, whereas in a persuasive essay you can use all three methods of persuasion in any combination. The tragic events that lead to the actuality of the gun control discussion are heavily loaded with both emotion and authoritative opinions. So, writing a gun control persuasive essay and using whichever methods of persuasion you like should be easier than writing an argumentative essay and using only logic and rationality.
For example, in a persuasive essay, you can use somewhat emotional language which you are to avoid by all means in an argumentative essay. As for the pre-writing and writing process, a persuasive essay will indeed be very similar to an argumentative one: The only distinguishing feature is that in your concluding paragraphs you not only explain why your standpoint is right but also dwell upon why the opposing standpoint is wrong.
As we have mentioned, gun control is a very broad topic, and if you choose or have to write about it, you can go as deep and as broad as you want. So, it can be a simple five-paragraph essay or a profound gun control research paper. However, a research paper is still too small a paper to cover all there is about gun control, so you will have to narrow down your topic.
Hence, picking the right topic should be your first step. Your topic should not only be exciting to you, but the format of the research paper also demands that it was original - so that you had something new or, at least, relatively new to say about it.
Most likely, you can remain flexible about your topic up until the moment when you begin the actual writing. This means that in the course of your research you may come across some new data which will suggest a more exciting topic, so you should be ready for it and not be afraid to change the subject on the go. The format of a research paper also suggests that you use more sources in your research than in a simple five-paragraph essay.
The culprits were either detained or killed. Some took their own lives before the police could even respond to the scene. In the end, America keeps losing children, teachers, brothers, and sisters. The population is decreased, but the problem persists. With all these shooting sprees looming above us like the Grim Reaper, is gun control what we really need? Or is there a more serious problem we are facing here? Why not, when guns have not been banned in some states?
In Australia in , 35 people died when a man indiscriminately shot them. In the melee, 23 were wounded. This prompted the Australian government to think and implement strict rules regarding gun use. As a result, the number of mass killings in the Land Down Under has been reduced, if not completely eradicated.
There are politicians in America who support stronger gun control, such as Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Both of them thought of Australia as the model for stringent gun laws. Other people argue that they need firearms because they use it for self-defense. They acquire a license for it, and as such, they are expected to use their weapons only when the need arises.
Essays - largest database of quality sample essays and research papers on Argumentative Essay On Gun Control.
Free gun control papers, essays, and research papers.
Gun Control Essay Do we really need gun control? America has recently witnessed a number of shooting and indiscriminate firing incidents in schools, malls, and villages. With any essay on gun control you can state your opinion in one way or another and then can get to work on crafting how your essay will flow. In this assessment, you additionally will research this topic.
Against Gun Control Essay The problem of gun control is hotly debated nowadays. 50% of the population are for it explaining that having a gun provides them some protection. Because of various reasons our justice system cannot always protect us which is why the majority of people is looking for some other ways of. Mar 24, · Free Essays from Bartleby | Gun Control Gun Control is a topic that has been talked about for many years now especially after many tragic deaths and other.