Skip Nav

Leaders vs Managers Essay

Leadership Vs. Management

❶I read a case study of an Apple founded by Steve Jobs in An analysis of endurance:

How to cite this page




Clearly describes the implications of your leadership views, supported by relevant examples. Distinguished — Clearly and comprehensively explains in detail the issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding.

Required Resources Text Northouse, P. Leadership theory and practice 6th ed. Links to an external site.. How to lead without formal authority. Perspectives for Managers, , Leadership in desperate times: An analysis of endurance: Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9 2 , The main differences between leaders and managers are: Leaders and managers have a difference in emotional intelligence.

A leader is an individual who strategizes a visionary and most importantly someone who inspires other people to greatness. In order to achieve this, while leading one must share their vision with the staff or people brought together to solve a problem or create a strategy. Leaders serve as role models, motivate their staff, inspire cooperation and create a community both inside and outside of the organization. They mostly follow their intuition which in most cases benefits the company and in most cases they gain followers who become loyal to them and the organization.

Another major difference between leaders and managers is how their duties and relationship with their followers differ. A leader creates or rather innovates whilst the manager administers , meaning that the leader is the individual who comes up with fresh ideas in order to move the bulk of the organization into a new direction that is more beneficial and profitable.

It is important for him to be updated on the latest trends as well as studies and the skill sets. Contrary to this, a manager simply maintains a system that has already been established and is in use. It is his duty to maintain control and ensure that things run normally and everyone in the staff is pulling their weight and contributing fully and effectively.

One of the distinguishing characteristics of a typical manager is how dependent he is on the activities of a variety of other people to perform his job effectively.

He is rigid and unable to be creative in carrying out his duties, thereby barring him from being considered a business leader.

According to Richard Rosenberg, one of the most profound examples of the difference between leaders and managers is how computers create significant changes in any organization. He illustrates how information is able to travel from top to bottom effectively without the intervention of managers somewhere in between. This shows how the difference between leaders and managers which is that managers are easily replaceable and in some cases they are not required at all to some extent.

When the common interest is being identified, people voluntarily follow him. Rather than asking the people to work, a leader prefers to call them for work and they just follow the instructions of a leader. This important quality makes a big difference between the style of functioning of a manger and a leader.

There is a big difference in the working style of a manager. A leader attracts the people with the charisma he is having. He used to have an upper hand in technological knowledge than the workers. Leadership may not have any relevance with the functioning of the organization. On the other hand the management is different in its way of functioning.

A manager keeps the organizational priority at his best. He has to do certain tasks as per the guidelines set by the organization. He then plans to achieve this by his people. Here the manager uses the modern management tools. He is interested in directing, planning and organizing. To make this effective he also uses modern management tools. A leader innovates and the manager administers Bennis W, Doyal S, Leadership is setting up vision and Direction and management is implementation of this Doyal S, A leader set his vision and the followers follow his vision almost voluntarily.

He seldom needs force to attract towards him in execution of his direction and vision. On the other hand the manager executes the vision of the organization. On his journey towards this he will also be using leadership skills to effectively manage his people.

A manger with leadership skills can effectively manage the organization. There should be a force attracting the followers or a subordinate to the person directs them. In case of leadership it is often the quality of the leader or his charisma that attracts the people to him. On the other hand the manager and the leader should be the two sides of the coin. Latest management trends show an inclination towards improving the leadership qualities of a manager.

It is accepted that a manager should improve the output of the organization but it should be on the cost of the people working in the organization. The directing function of the manager is making people ready to perform certain task or assigning certain task to the people. This functional area of the manger has more to do with leadership. Once a task is to be performed, the concerned manager has to detail people or direct people to accomplish the task.

This is mostly done in different ways by a manager and a leader. However both leader and a manager use the function of directing. Followers voluntarily work as per the direction where as manager needs to have something else for motivating the people to work.

This may be different to different organization and also as per the management style it differs. Organizations have special structure and policies to motivate the people to work and managers are part of it. In the field of emergency medical services the directing function of the manager has a lot to do with routine jobs.

Things are to be done at high pace and many times immediate decisions are to be taken. The chances of going these decisions wrong are high. In this scenario subordinates should be motivated and encouraged to take decisions at time of emergency. Also the manager should be able to provide directions without any delay. His competence as a leader is very important.

A leader comes forward to take the responsibility of the actions of his followers. The followers also recognize this fact and there are more people willing to work under a leader under emergencies.

This is what actually needed in an emergency service. At the same time the leader should be conversant with the procedures adopted in an emergency. A manager is a technical person and he is likely to be thorough in procedures and policies. Union of managerial qualities and leadership skills will be a good formula for emergency medical services. Leaders are emotionally more intelligent than ordinary managers. A manager wants to be successful should have high emotional intelligence.

People having high emotional intelligence tend to be leaders. He is not a pusher; he pulls rather than pushes Terry R G, A typical manager does not follow this style. He plans and direct people to get the work done. There is set of duties and responsibilities for each person in the organization. A manager ensures this is been done.

He uses his control function to see things are going as per the schedule. A manger often uses his control powers. In contrast a leader expects his subordinates to perform the way it is desired.

For example if a staff is coming late to his duty. The typical manager may think of taking corrective action, where as a leader may be thinking to find out the reasons behind the late coming of the staff and may be willing to support that person.

Similar actions make the follower emotionally attached to the leader and they keep the individual interest only next to the common goals. In emergency medical service, emotional intelligence is a highly required quality of the person heading the operation.

A leader who is empathetic and understands the emotions of others can do a lot in getting people involved in the service. A leader should avoid knee jerk reactions. It is already said emotional intelligence makes the difference in actions of a manager and a leader. A manager who is low in emotional intelligence may follow only the rule book and this kind of attitude may lead to poor quality service especially in emergency medical service.

It is good to be knowledgeable but at the same time the managers should understand the need of being empathetic to the subordinates and the customers. The system is working with a lot of supervisors, ordinary staff and managers and a wide net work is being formed.


Main Topics

Privacy Policy

Management vs. Leadership Introduction Leadership and Management Essays] Research Papers words ( pages) Essay about Leadership and Management - During my coursework learning about the variety of leadership styles, I have been able to take something positive away from each style. My personal preference is the "participative.

Privacy FAQs

Management and Leadership Introduction Management and leadership are two separate skills needed to control the function and direction of task. Separating the definition of leadership and management .

About Our Ads

We will write a custom essay sample on Leaders vs Managers specifically for you for only $ $/page. Order now In conclusion, management and leadership are not necessarily mutually exclusive. They are however different in that leadership entails inspiration as well as steering an organization whereas management is simply overseeing. Free Essay: This essay will focus on the meaning of leadership and management, also which view is the most relevant to the Tourism Industry. In order to.

Cookie Info

Sample Essay: The Difference Between Management and Leadership. Introduction. Is there any difference between leadership and management? Or leadership and management are the same? On a close look it can be seen that many managers are not leaders, though successful in their field. Leaders lead from the front and managers believe in directing. Write a three to four page paper (not including the title and references pages) that: • Defines leadership and management. • Defends or criticizes the view that leadership and management .