However, this may not always be the case. Further examination of this essay proves to show that Engs tends to be confused on her points. She starts off stating that she is for it, but towards the end of the essay she brings in facts that dissuade the reader as to why the drinking age should be lowered.
This shows that Engs tends to be going hither and thither on her arguments. On the other hand, she presents a fair picture of both sides of the argument regarding lowering the drinking age.
The main audience that this article reaches is the legislation of the states to push for the passing of a lower drinking age. The information provided by the author does not exactly help the point that she is trying to get across to her audience.
For example, she brings up a fact that is as follows,. Therefore, this piece of information goes against her argument that the drinking age should be lowered. While I understand that some members in my age group have shown their ludicrous ways, the majority of us are going to college trying to make something of ourselves. In , the United States government ruled that the states would either change their minimum legal drinking age to twenty-one, or the highway departments would suffer cuts in budgets.
Since then, many people have argued for or against this act, but the battle still continues. Even professors are adamantly involved in trying to get the age lowered.
In the United States, one is considered an adult at the age of eighteen. If one is considered responsible enough to fight for the U. Jeff Rainforth, a man running for U. Congress, stated that if the minimum legal drinking age was not changed, he was going to propose that those turning eighteen joining the armed forces could still join, but they would not be allowed to fight in combat until reaching twenty-one. He claims that it is easier sometimes for a person to obtain drugs than it is for them to purchase a single can of beer Rainforth 1.
So you see, there are far worse things to consume than alcohol. Would you rather your kids be out drinking—not much, just a sip or two—or would you rather them be out smoking marijuana or much more dangerous drugs? It cannot be both ways Rainforth 1.
The Califonia State Supreme Court recently gave prosecutors the authority to charge minors as young as 14 as adults for crimes committed Rainforth 2. In America, a citizen is claimed to have all of these rights. An American citizen is supposed to be able to make their own life choices and decisions. Citizens in other countries are able to make their own alcohol consumption decisions at the time of being able to walk! The main argument in support of higher legal drinking age is that it helps to reduce road accidents caused by the dunked youth.
However, if road safety is really the focal concern, then it is more helpful to rise the legal driving age. Nevertheless, nations which hold both driving and drinking age at eighteen years have safer highways compared to America. Neuroscience at least have made a reasonable argument that, keeping the legal drinking age at twenty one assists to ensure no legal drinkers in high school. This is vital because alcohol particularly at adolescence stage damages the student brain which increases the possibility of future addiction and abuse.
However, keeping legal drinking age at twenty one put the universities and colleges in the challenging situation which requires them to educate a generation of drinkers whereby half are legally allowed to take alcoholic beverages while the other half is not.
This results to vast illegal alcohol consumptions in campus which is not monitored or regulated, and thus can easily result to drinking problems. Therefore, the only lasting solution which can help to settle this problem of illegal drinking among the young people is lowering the legal drinking age to eighteen years and ensure proper enforcement mechanism are used.
The present system that forbids American under-twenty one from purchasing and consuming alcohol is broadly flouted with hazardous consequences. The youth should be taught how to drink responsibly before they achieve the legal drinking age set by the government. Moreover, educating these young people on the risks associated with excessive alcohol consumption is more important than keeping the drinking age at twenty one.
Adults should help adolescents to change their view on risky indulge drinking as a rite of passage.
The drinking age should be lowered from 21 years old to 18 years old because at that age one legally becomes an adult, it would reduce the amount of unsafe drinking activity, and there are fewer drunk driving car accidents in many other countries with a drinking age of
Lowering the Drinking Age Essay - According to Andrew Herman, “Each year, 14, die from drinking too much. , are victims of alcohol related physical assault and 17, are a result of drunken driving deaths, many being innocent bystanders” ().
The main argument in support of higher legal drinking age is that it helps to reduce road accidents caused by the dunked youth. However, if road safety is really the . The United States Should Lower the Legal Drinking Age to Eighteen - The United States’ minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) of twenty one is almost a perfect example of a policy with unrealistic expectations and serious unintended consequences.
I can assure you the under age drinking age percentage would drop if the age is lowered. Few reasons for teens drinking are: peer pressure, enjoyment, etc. But the main reason for doing so is “breaking the law.” 87% of high school seniors have used alcohol. Well I for one believe that the legal drinking age should be lowered from twenty-one to eighteen. If we are considered an adult and expected to act like one at age 18 it .