Skip Nav

What is a pilot study?

Get all these articles in 1 guide

❶Generally, the pilot study technique specifically refers to a smaller scale version of the experiment, although equipment tests are an increasingly important part of this sub-group of experiments. A consistent selection bias favouring reports of primary research over papers on research methods, theoretical thinking, or secondary analysis, can lead to many of researchers re-inventing the wheel without having had the opportunity to learn from other people's experience.

Reader's Guide

Looks like you do not have access to this content.
9 Comments on What is a pilot study?
Search Here:

For example, the medical researchers may conduct a smaller survey upon a hundred people, to check that the protocols are fine. The Amazon Researchers may perform an experiment, in similar conditions, sending a small team either to the Amazon to test the procedures, or by using something like the tropical bio-dome at the Eden Project.

Pilot studies are also excellent for training inexperienced researchers, allowing them to make mistakes without fear of losing their job or failing the assignment. Logistical and financial estimates can be extrapolated from the pilot study, and the research question , and the project can be streamlined to reduce wastage of resources and time.

Pilots can be an important part of attracting grants for research as the results can be placed before the funding body. Generally, most funding bodies see research as an investment, so are not going to dole out money unless they are certain that there is a chance of a financial return. Unfortunately, there are seldom paper reporting the preliminary pilot study, especially if problems were reported, is often stigmatized and sidelined. This is unfair, and punishes researchers for being methodical, so these attitudes are under a period of re-evaluation.

Discouraging researchers from reporting methodological errors , as found in pilot studies, means that later researchers may make the same mistakes. The other major problem is deciding whether the results from the pilot study can be included in the final results and analysis, a procedure that varies wildly between disciplines. Pilots are rapidly becoming an essential pre-cursor to many research projects, especially when universities are constantly striving to reduce costs.

Whilst there are weaknesses, they are extremely useful for driving procedures in an age increasingly dominated by technology, much of it untested under field conditions. Check out our quiz-page with tests about:. Martyn Shuttleworth Jul 14, Retrieved Sep 14, from Explorable. Any recommended changes to the protocol should be clearly outlined.

A tutorial on pilot studies: Cocks K and Torgerson DJ. A Confidence Interval approach. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. Design and analysis of pilot studies: J Eval Clin Pract. Your email address will not be published. Pilot study is carried before starting work on final study. This is conducting to check the feasibility if the the research area. It will be helpful to continue or stop the final research.

I do need it for my Geography Paper 3 tomorrow. Hi, my name is Aminata Odel. During Sociology and Research Methodology. Publication bias may occur because of a tendency for journals to accept only papers that have statistically significant results and not to report non-significant effects Mahoney ; Chann ; Dickersin, It follows that papers reporting methodological issues, such as those identified during the pilot phase of a study, will also be less attractive to publishers.

Selective publication of research results has been recognised as a problem. It may lead to an overestimation of the effectiveness of interventions, exposing patients to useless or harmful treatments, while overestimation of adverse effects may mean that patients are denied effective forms of care Oxman et al. However, it is equally important to ensure that lessons learned with respect to the research method are shared, otherwise patients may be subjected to poorly developed tools or money may be wasted because methods of recruitment failed.

A consistent selection bias favouring reports of primary research over papers on research methods, theoretical thinking, or secondary analysis, can lead to many of researchers re-inventing the wheel without having had the opportunity to learn from other people's experience. Conclusions It has been said that pilot studies are likely to be "underdiscussed, underused and underreported" Prescott and Soeken, p Full reports of pilot studies are rare in the research literature Lindquist, ; Muoio et al, , van Teijlingen et al.

When reported, they often only justify the research methods or particular research tool used. Too often research papers only refer to one element of the pilot study, for example, to the 'pre-testing' or 'pilot testing' of a questionnaire De Vaus, Such papers simply state: Some of these processes and outcomes from both successful and failed pilot studies might be very useful to others embarking on projects using similar methods and instruments.

This is particularly important because pilot studies can be "time-consuming, frustrating, and fraught with unanticipated problems, but it is better to deal with them before investing a great deal of time, money, and effort in the full study" Mason and Zuercher, It has also been argued that the current research climate demands accountability from researchers, which means that there is a need to ensure the best possible use of research results Crosswaite and Curtice We would like to go one step further and argue that researchers have an ethical obligation to make the best use of their research experience by reporting issues arising from all parts of a study, including the pilot phase.

Well-designed and well-conducted pilot studies can inform us about the best research process and occasionally about likely outcomes.

Therefore investigators should be encouraged to report their pilot studies, and in particular to report in more detail the actual improvements made to the study design and the research process.

Health Promotion International 9: Journal of the American Medical Association Raising research awareness among midwives and nurses: Journal of Advanced Nursing 31 1: Cognitive Therapy Research 1: Pilot studies in clinical nursing research. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing.

How to use an overview. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. A Handbook of Quantitative Methods , London: The fate of published articles, submitted again. Methods, Appraisal and Utilization. Harcourt Brace College Publishers.

Pilot studies can play a very important role prior to conducting a full-scale research project

Main Topics

Privacy Policy

A pilot study is a standard scientific tool for 'soft' research, allowing scientists to conduct a preliminary analysis before committing to a full-blown study or experiment.

Privacy FAQs

The pilot study in the current research can be defined as mainly a try-out of research techniques and methods, but also of questionnaires and interviews. The researcher.

About Our Ads

A pilot study is a small study designed to gather information prior to a larger study, in order to improve the quality of final study. A pilot study can reveal deficiencies in the design of a proposed research proposal. A good research strategy requires careful planning & a pilot study often is a part of this strategy. 6 6. A pilot study is a research study conducted before the intended study. Pilot studies are usually executed as planned for the intended study, but on a smaller scale. Pilot studies are usually executed as planned for the intended study, but on a smaller scale.

Cookie Info

This unique multi-volume reference set offers readers an all-encompassing education in the ways of social science researchers. Written to be accessible to ge. The importance of pilot studies. Edwin R. van Teijlingen and Vanora Hundley. Dr Edwin van Teijlingen is a medical sociologist and Senior Lecturer in Public Health at the Department of Public Health, University of Aberdeen.